翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Distributed amplifier
・ Distributed Annotation System
・ Distributed Annotation System/Clients
・ Distributed antenna system
・ Distributed AOP
・ Distributed Application Specification Language
・ Distributed architecture for mobile navigation
・ Distributed Art Publishers
・ Distributed artificial intelligence
・ Distributed Bragg reflector
・ Distributed Bragg reflector laser
・ Distributed cache
・ Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse
・ Distributed Codec Engine
・ Distributed cognition
Distributed Common Ground System
・ Distributed Component Object Model
・ Distributed computing
・ Distributed Computing (journal)
・ Distributed Computing Environment
・ Distributed concurrency control
・ Distributed Concurrent Versions System
・ Distributed constraint optimization
・ Distributed control system
・ Distributed coordination function
・ Distributed creativity
・ Distributed data flow
・ Distributed Data Management Architecture
・ Distributed Data Protocol
・ Distributed data store


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Distributed Common Ground System : ウィキペディア英語版
Distributed Common Ground System

The Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS) is a weapons system which produces military intelligence for both the United States Army and United States Air Force (where it is officially known as the AN/GSQ-272 Sentinel).
==Description==
While in U.S. Air Force use, the system produces intelligence collected by the U-2 Dragonlady, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-9 Reaper and MQ-1 Predator. The previous system of similar use was the Deployable Ground Station (DGS), which was first deployed in July 1994. Subsequent version of DGS were developed from 1995 through 2009.〔
Although officially designated a "weapons system", it consists of computer hardware and software connected together in a computer network, devoted to processing and dissemination of information such as images.
The 480th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing of the Air Combat Command operates and maintains the USAF system.
A plan envisioned in 1998 was to develop interoperable systems for the Army and Navy, in addition to the Air Force.
By 2006, version 10.6 was deployed by the Air Force, and a version known as DCGS-A was developed for the Army.
After a 2010 report by General Michael T. Flynn, the program was intended to use cloud computing and be as easy to use as an iPad, which soldiers over a few years were commonly using.
By April 2011, project manager Colonel Charles Wells announced version 3 of the Army system (code named "Griffin") was being deployed in the US war in Afghanistan.
In January 2012, the United States Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center hosted a meeting based on the DCGS-A early experience. It brought together technology providers in the hope of developing more integrated systems using cloud computing with open architectures, compared to previously specialized custom-built systems.
A major contractor was Lockheed Martin, with computers supplied by Silicon Graphics International out of its Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin office.
Software known as the Analyst's Notebook, originally developed by i2 Limited, was included in DCGS-A. IBM acquired i2 in 2011.
Some US Army personnel reported using a Palantir Technologies product to improve their ability to predict locations of improvised explosive devices.
An April 2012 report recommending further study after initial success. Palantir software was rated easy to use, but did not have the flexibility and wide number of data sources of DCGS-A.
In July 2012, Congressman Duncan D. Hunter (from California, the state where Palantir is based) complained of US DoD obstacles to its wider use.
Although a limited test in August 2011 by the Test and Evaluation Command had recommended deployment, operation problems of DCGS-A included the baseline system was "not operationally effective" with reboots on average about every 8 hours. A set of improvements was identified in November 2012.
The press reported some of the shortcomings uncovered by General Genaro Dellarocco in the tests.
The ambitious goal of integrating 473 data sources for 75 million reports proved to be challenging, after spending an estimated $2.3 billion on the Army system alone.〔
In May 2013 ''Politico'' reported that Palantir lobbyists and some anonymous returning veterans continued to advocate the use of its software, despite its interoperability limits. In particular, members of special forces and US Marines were not required to use the official Army system.
Similar stories appeared in other publications, with Army representatives (such as Major General Mary A. Legere) citing the limitations of various systems.
Congressman Hunter was a member of the House Armed Services Committee which required a review of the program, after two other members of congress sent an open letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. The Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee included testimony from Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno. The 130th Engineer Brigade (United States) has found the system to be "unstable, slow, not friendly and a major hindrance to operations".〔 〕
The equivalent system for the United States Navy was planned for initial deployment by 2015, and within a shipboard network called Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) by 2016.〔
Some early testing was announced in 2009 aboard the aircraft carrier .
A portion of the software, a distributed data framework for the DCGS integration backbone (DIB) version 4, was submitted to an open-source software repository of the Codice Foundation on GitHub.
The framework was new for DIB version 4, replacing the legacy DIB portal with an Ozone Widget Framework interface.
It was written in the Java programming language.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Distributed Common Ground System」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.